Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
High School Electives
/
Speech & Debate
/
Plan LD Cross-Examination
Grade Level
Speech & Debate
SD.154 Plan LD Cross-Examination
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
The affirmative's main evidence supports only a modest short-term benefit, while the speech claims a sweeping permanent change. You want to expose the mismatch without delivering a rebuttal speech during cross-examination. Which sequence is best?
A
1) Your evidence is tiny and your rhetoric is exaggerated. A short pilot cannot prove permanent change, and the judge should reject the contention. Do you agree?
B
1) Who authored the source? 2) What journal published it? 3) How many citations does it have? 4) Did you read the entire article?
C
1) What exact outcome did your evidence measure? 2) Over what period was that outcome observed? 3) Where does the source project a permanent or system-wide change? 4) So the evidence directly supports a modest short-term result, not the full claim, correct?
D
1) Is the benefit modest? 2) Is the claim sweeping? 3) Can change be permanent? 4) Can evidence be limited?
Submit Answer