7.29 Author's Purpose and Point of View Worksheet

As a community mediator, I’m cautious when I write about evaluating a conflict-resolution program at school. Students who attended sessions reported feeling heard, which reduced the urge to “get even” later. However, students who entered the program unwillingly showed smaller changes. Because I facilitate the sessions, I watch for my own bias and rely on referral data as well as stories. In the latest run, the value shifted by a 15% drop in repeated referrals. Because the writer is responsible for accuracy, the language is careful and qualified. Examples are chosen to make the change seem practical and worthwhile. Some information is emphasized while other information is briefly mentioned or left out. That pattern can reveal the author’s purpose and point of view. The writer highlights benefits before mentioning any drawbacks.

As an ocean science graduate student, I’m cautious when I write about testing microplastic levels at the pier. Samples taken after a holiday weekend contained more fibers than samples taken on a quiet weekday. Most pieces were too small to see without a microscope, which is why the problem feels invisible. Because contamination can come from clothing and equipment, I used blank controls to check my own process. In the latest run, the value shifted by three fibers per liter. Because the writer is responsible for accuracy, the language is careful and qualified. The writer focuses on costs, risks, or unfair results. Word choice suggests frustration and a desire for change. Some information is emphasized while other information is briefly mentioned or left out. That pattern can reveal the author’s purpose and point of view.

Summary for decision-makers: key findings about funding trade-offs for building new sports fields. Prepared by the Maple Budget Office. The report lists upfront construction costs alongside long-term upkeep like irrigation, lighting, and resurfacing. It compares the field project to delayed repairs at older playgrounds and sidewalks. Rather than recommending a single choice, the brief asks leaders to name the priorities they value most. Data from the last review period show a $1.2 million maintenance gap. The tone stays formal, but the selection of evidence reflects the writer’s priorities. The writer explains the topic in a mostly neutral way. Details are organized to help the reader follow the explanation. Some information is emphasized while other information is briefly mentioned or left out.