Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
AP Courses
/
AP U.S. Government
/
Baker v. Carr: Justiciability and Redistricting
Grade Level
AP U.S. Government
APG.103 Baker v. Carr: Justiciability and Redistricting
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
Use the AP free-response planning chart. Which claim-evidence-reasoning line would earn credit for Baker v. Carr?
A
Claim: Baker required counsel for criminal defendants; Evidence: indigent defendant; Reasoning: redistricting is a Sixth Amendment issue.
B
Claim: Baker protected newspapers from prior restraint; Evidence: Pentagon Papers; Reasoning: maps are classified documents.
C
Claim: Baker banned school prayer; Evidence: classroom devotional reading; Reasoning: establishment clause controls redistricting.
D
Claim: Baker made Equal Protection apportionment claims justiciable; Evidence: unequal districts; Reasoning: courts can review state maps for constitutional vote dilution.
Submit Answer
