A student is checking whether a comparison remains logically parallel. Paragraph 1: The draft concerns dispute resolution. It evaluates mediation and arbitration according to party control and finality, first observing that mediation uses a neutral facilitator to help parties negotiate their own agreement and then that arbitration asks a neutral decision-maker to hear the dispute and issue a ruling. Paragraph 2: A new sentence must compare like with like before the paragraph can proceed. Several details may be true, but the revision must treat both subjects by the established standard and clarify why the distinction matters. Which detail is both accurate and relevant to the comparison already underway for the comparison of mediation and arbitration?