Read the passage. [1] A conservation group negotiated easements along a damaged river corridor. [2] Landowners retain their property while agreeing to protect streamside vegetation. [3] The connected agreements give wildlife and floodwater more room than isolated restoration sites could provide. [4] The easement strategy sets limits on development beside the river, and it links separate properties into a continuous restoration corridor. The writer's priority is to highlight the fact that the easement strategy links separate properties into a continuous restoration corridor without deleting the supporting fact that the easement strategy sets limits on development beside the river. Which revision most clearly gives the target idea greater weight?