An original advanced humanities excerpt presents two closely related critical positions. The reparative reader frames critical stance through a method that looks for sustaining possibilities and partial attachments within flawed texts; its key evidence would be a troubling novel read for moments that still enable care or surprise. The paranoid reader shares the general concern with critical stance, but it anticipates hidden harm by exposing suspicion, domination, or bad faith; its key evidence would be the same novel scanned for the ideology it disguises before it can injure readers. Which comparison is most faithful to the evidence in both passage notes?