Read the passage. The restaurant review spends a paragraph on cumin smoke, chipped tiles, and the owner's habit of greeting regulars by name. Yet the critic is not merely describing atmosphere. She argues that the restaurant preserves a form of neighborhood memory threatened by rising rents and standardized storefronts. The meal matters because it gives the critic a way to discuss what a city loses when distinctive places disappear. Which answer avoids overemphasizing an anecdote or side point in the passage about restaurant review as memory?