Reconstruct the answer proof for this Reading Comprehension problem. The included text is: Oral histories may contain memory errors, but official archives also reflect what institutions chose to record. Used critically, oral testimony can reveal meanings, motives, and experiences absent from administrative documents. The author argues for triangulating the two sources rather than ranking one as inherently reliable. The original question is Which statement best expresses the passage's central claim about oral histories and official archives? Two answers remain. Finalist 1: Official archives are always false and should be replaced by oral testimony. Finalist 2: Oral histories and official archives have different limitations and should be compared critically to recover a fuller account. Select the proof that should control the final choice. Reject the finalist that changes scope or effect.