Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
College Test Prep
/
LSAT
/
Claim-Evidence-Warrant Alignment
Grade Level
LSAT
AW.041 Claim-Evidence-Warrant Alignment
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
A public library's recommendation app increases borrowing but repeatedly suggests books from a narrow set of familiar genres. Many users do not realize that their prior clicks control the suggestions. Which reasoning chain best fits the evidence?
A
Claim: Keep the system unchanged. Evidence: Borrowing increased. Warrant: Aggregate engagement makes user awareness and breadth irrelevant.
B
Claim: Keep optional personalization but disclose how it works, provide a diversity setting, and make opt-out easy. Evidence: Recommendations aid borrowing yet can invisibly narrow exposure. Warrant: Personalization should support discovery without covertly constraining a user's informed control over what is presented.
C
Claim: Ban every personalized suggestion. Evidence: The current design narrows genres. Warrant: A remediable design flaw proves personalization has no possible value.
D
Claim: Replace recommendations with random titles only. Evidence: Users may not understand the algorithm. Warrant: Lack of transparency requires abandoning all relevance to user interests.
Submit Answer
