Argument: The author acknowledges that the redesigned logo is easier to recognize at small sizes. Yet that point does not settle the issue. Since the design resembles the logo of a partner organization in the same field, the nonprofit should not adopt it without further review, despite the suggestion that recognizability at small size is the only relevant test for a logo. The author also notes that confusion between the two organizations could misdirect donations. Which statement is the limited acknowledgment that the author later pivots away from?