Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
College Test Prep
/
LSAT
/
Exceptional Case versus General Tendency
Grade Level
LSAT
LR.160 Exceptional Case versus General Tendency
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
Which one of the following identifies the problem with the inference about browser content filters?
A
It presumes that two possible explanations for fewer pop-up windows cannot both be partly correct.
B
It concludes from a probabilistic pattern that the individual case must match the pattern, although tendencies can admit contrary cases.
C
It treats the absence of proof for a competing claim about browser content filters as proof that the competing claim is false.
D
It infers that every member of browsers with filters has a feature merely because the group as a whole has that feature.
E
It changes the meaning of the term 'filter' between the evidence and the conclusion.
Submit Answer
