LSAT.213 Function of a Counterargument
0%
Skill Level🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level25% to Medium
EasyMediumHardMastery100%

In the argument, the author resists a narrow account of eldercare robotics. That account says that robots are worthwhile if they reduce the number of human caregiver visits needed. The author does not deny that automation can relieve some routine tasks; instead, the author argues that the account fails because care also involves trust and companionship that fewer visits may weaken. The author uses the counterargument primarily to: