A writer is testing thesis options before drafting. Practice prompt: Should a city make outdoor dining parklets permanent? Perspective set: one side can cite parklets increased revenue for small restaurants and enlivened sidewalks. The strongest objection is that accessibility advocates noted that some parklets narrowed pedestrian routes. The writer has time for only two developed reasons and one concise concession. Which selection best applies clarity, supportability, nuance, counterargument resilience, and fit with the prompt?