A reviewer notes that an otherwise fluent draft loses force because a key argumentative connection is underdeveloped. Issue: whether the university lab course should prioritize adding a peer-review checklist over standardizing faculty logo templates. Thesis: The draft supports adding a peer-review checklist because it better advances better evidence-based lab reports. Excerpt from the draft: The conclusion merely repeats the introduction and adds a new point about the shape of the departmental logo. It does not show how the essay's reasons combine. Which proposed change would have the greatest global effect on the essay's persuasiveness and coherence?