Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
College Test Prep
/
LSAT
/
Hypothesis, Method, Result, and Interpretation
Grade Level
LSAT
RC.166 Hypothesis, Method, Result, and Interpretation
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
For the robot-versus-human-contact passage, which option accurately separates the study's prediction from its method, result, and interpretation?
A
The proposed claim was that robot conversations would reduce loneliness more than human calls because the embodied device would provide a distinctive form of companionship; the empirical approach involved researchers who randomly assigned participants to robot, human-call, or wait-list groups and measured loneliness with blinded assessors before and after the program; the evidence showed that both conversation groups improved similarly relative to the wait-list, with no reliable difference between robot and human contact; the authors inferred that regular structured interaction reduced loneliness, but the findings did not support a robot-specific advantage.
B
The proposed claim was that robot conversations would outperform human calls; the empirical approach involved researchers who randomized three conditions with blinded outcome assessment; the evidence showed that both active conditions improved equally over the wait-list; the authors inferred that because robots did not outperform calls, structured social contact had no effect.
C
The proposed claim was that human calls would worsen loneliness while robots would eliminate it; the empirical approach involved researchers who allowed participants to choose between a robot and a volunteer; the evidence showed that only the wait-list improved; the authors inferred that avoiding conversation is the best intervention.
D
The proposed claim was that robot embodiment would produce a unique benefit; the empirical approach involved researchers who randomly compared robot, human-call, and wait-list groups; the evidence showed that robots outperformed both other groups by a large margin; the authors inferred that the device's physical form was proven to be the active ingredient.
Submit Answer
