During prewriting, a student needs a neutral frame for this issue: whether a regional transit authority should redesign routes to prioritize high-ridership corridors over broad coverage. The perspectives concern faster, more frequent service for the largest number of riders, reduced access for lower-density neighborhoods with few alternatives, the additional point that paratransit or feeder service may affect equity, and the broader tension that efficiency and geographic fairness may conflict. Which summary would best organize the issue before the student chooses a position?