Essay excerpt: the draft connects the policy to a practical consequence by showing that transfer readiness can appear in work history, later grades, and course patterns, and it narrows the claim by explaining that the process uses published factors and reviewer training to reduce arbitrariness. The thesis is that the university should use holistic review for transfer applicants with disrupted transcripts. The writer has not denied the concern that holistic review can seem inconsistent or subjective; instead, the writer relies on this limit: the process uses published factors and reviewer training to reduce arbitrariness. Which conclusion best clarifies the limiting principle and stakes of the argument?