A cultural-heritage passage says a repatriation claim
is strongest when the object is sacred or ceremonial, is identifiable to a present community, and was removed without meaningful consent. A merely old object with uncertain affiliation presents a weaker claim.
New fact pattern: A museum holds a ceremonial mask catalogued to a present community and taken by officials during a period when the community's ceremonies were legally suppressed.
According to the passage, which outcome follows from the new fact pattern?