Review this original LSAT Logical Reasoning practice scenario. Stimulus: A reviewer writes, 'The evidence makes the safety benefit plausible, but not proven; therefore, a limited trial is warranted, not immediate full adoption.' Practice-item stem: Which response best states the reviewer's position? Two draft responses remain after elimination. Response 1: A limited trial is justified while full adoption remains unsupported. Response 2: The safety benefit has been conclusively proven and full adoption is required. Both responses may appear connected to the stimulus. Which option best applies the one-best-answer standard?