Skip to content
free
K
1
2
practice
Home
Math
English
Science
Social Studies
Contact
Language
English
Español
Sign In
/
College Test Prep
/
LSAT
/
Tu Quoque and Hypocrisy
Grade Level
LSAT
LR.171 Tu Quoque and Hypocrisy
0%
Skill Level
🔴 Hard
00:00
Progress to Next Level
25% to Medium
Easy
Medium
Hard
Mastery
100%
Which answer best explains why counsel's reply does not refute Ellis's criticism?
A
The reply is flawed because it treats the absence of proof against the company's gift policy as proof that the company's gift policy is acceptable.
B
The reply changes the subject from the merits of the criticism to Professor Ellis's behavior, which is not enough to defeat the criticism.
C
The reply is flawed because it treats a possible exception to a rule as though the rule were never followed.
D
The reply is flawed because it assumes that the mere possibility of an innocent explanation eliminates the need to address the evidence.
E
The reply is flawed because it assumes that Professor Ellis's motive for speaking must be the same as the company's counsel's motive for replying.
Submit Answer
