A proposal suggests using anonymous peer ratings to grade group projects. Supporters claim anonymity will make students honest about unequal effort. But anonymity can also remove accountability, making it easier to exaggerate complaints or retaliate. In a pilot in one class, several students reported they could not respond to negative ratings because they did not know the specific concerns. A better system is transparent feedback: students write specific examples of contributions, and teachers moderate conflicts. This approach still addresses unequal work while keeping evaluations fair.